<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rant against Dawkins!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidjeanneret.co.uk/2007/05/04/rant-against-dawkins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidjeanneret.co.uk/2007/05/04/rant-against-dawkins/</link>
	<description>Ramblings, Links to useful websites, Photos, Funny things, More serious reflections.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fringe</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjeanneret.co.uk/2007/05/04/rant-against-dawkins/comment-page-1/#comment-5440</link>
		<dc:creator>Fringe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 20:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjeanneret.co.uk/2007/05/04/rant-against-dawkins/#comment-5440</guid>
		<description>In an obscurantist diatribe of namedropping and ad hominem, the author of the critique, avoids the obvious and Dawkin&#039;s major criticism of sky fairyism - where is the testable evidence that there is/are god/s/goddess/es?

As you point out - nice rant, but nothing substantial there - and his language is extremely defensive, with very good reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an obscurantist diatribe of namedropping and ad hominem, the author of the critique, avoids the obvious and Dawkin&#8217;s major criticism of sky fairyism &#8211; where is the testable evidence that there is/are god/s/goddess/es?</p>
<p>As you point out &#8211; nice rant, but nothing substantial there &#8211; and his language is extremely defensive, with very good reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

